Fitting of the continents How Antarctica became frozen Is our earth hollow? The Lost Book of Enki Intelligence evolved on planets? Origin of the races
Creation Science Rebuttals, Answers in Genesis, Are Dating Techniques Accurate
Hydrothermal Origin of Life? Did God Make Pathogenic Viruses? Is the Design Explanation Legitimate? How Far is Too Far? Does the Bible say Earth is Flat?
“Radiometric dating methods sometimes yield conflicting results, but the technique itself is scientific and reliable, and once the results are interpreted in a biblical framework, they yield clear patterns that help us better understand the earth’s history since creation six thousand years ago.”.
Christianity In America Millions of Years? The Bible says the world is about six thousand years old. But it seems like everything we learn from science tells us the world is billions of years old and the dinosaurs lived hundreds of millions of years ago. Who is telling the truth? What are the facts? Is a 6, year age for the earth based on different facts than a billion year age for the earth? No, everyone is looking at the same facts. We are looking at the same fossils. We are looking at the same layers of sediment?
We are looking at the same radiographic dating of rocks. No one disputes the facts. The difference comes from how those facts are interpreted. Why must the facts be interpreted? Because no one was there to see what happened.
Creation vs. Evolution
Exploring the wonders of geology in response to young-Earth claims Please read my guidelines and background posts before proceeding! Radiometric dating is not a simple topic. Chances are, you learned a simplified version of the technique at one point—if you remember your chemistry teacher discussing isotopes, half-lives, hourglasses, well, that was it—but have since removed the lesson to a box labeled “High School Amnesia” in some dark corner of your brain.
If you’re reading this now, however, you might be curious to reopen that box in an effort to follow my argument as I answer the title of this post or, if nothing else, to avoid admitting that chemistry was “not really your thing”. But whatever your passion for decaying metals and your level of chemical comprehension is now, I want to share my confidence that you can follow along just fine.
Two Minute Apologetics. Below are some quick answers to frequently asked questions (FAQ’s) that Catholics get. What does the word “apologetics” mean?
Compare 1 Timothy 2: They believe the Watchtower contains Gods truth, directed by Holy Spirit. Without it one cannot understand the Bible. They claim to be Christian but the vast majority reject Christ Blood and flesh and they do this in a ritualistic fashion every memorial of Christ death by passing the bread and wine among themselves and not eating it. Even the speaker must touch the plate or the cup and reject it for all to see. They use the name Jehovah over Yahweh but will agree Yahweh is more accurate.
Compare Jude 22 7. They claim they were approved and chosen by Christ Jesus in to do Gods will. However their teachings at the time and mistakes since then prove this could not be true. They let their loved ones die imposing their doctrinal ban on blood transfusions based on the law covenant. However people broke the law covenant when lives were at stake.
Such as saving a life of a sheep or human on the sabbath. King David broke the law to save his men. This they started in in order to control their members.
Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality
Why almost all scientists believe in evolution: It is impossible to prove that the theory of evolution is absolutely true. The theory maintains that plant evolution, animal evolution and the major geological changes to the earth unfolded over billions of years. Thus, the full theory cannot be demonstrated in the laboratory.
Top Ten Things Wrong with Jehovah’s Witnesses. 1. Christ Jesus is not their mediator but the governing body/organization is. (Compare 1 Timothy ).
The language of man follows things and imitates them; the Word of God precedes and creates them. Man speaks because things are; but these are because God hath spoken. Let Him speak again, and things will revert together with man who speaks of them, to nothing. Let us be content to perceive in creation a character which belongs only to God, and which distinguishes His work from that of His creatures. The human mind works only with the materials with which God supplies it; it observes, imitates, combines, but does not create.
The best painter in the world, composing the most beautiful picture that ever proceeded from the hand of man, creates nothing: Trace to the origin of each of the several things which have combined to form this picture, and you will find that all the channels from which they came, converge towards, and meet in the Creator, who is God. In thus showing us from its first page that the visible world has had such a wonderful beginning, the Bible informs us that it is also as a Creator that God saves souls.
Why most scientists support the theory of evolution
The way it really is: Even the way dates are reported e. However, although we can measure many things about a rock, we cannot directly measure its age. For example, we can measure its mass, its volume, its colour, the minerals in it, their size and the way they are arranged. We can crush the rock and measure its chemical composition and the radioactive elements it contains.
Robert Gagnon’s Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality _____ Index. I get a lot of email correspondence.
Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago.
It is also a shame that the masses have bought all this based on some circular reasoning about fossils, where fossils tend to be found buried, similarities between various life forms, the presence of certain decay products in rocks, and other inherently speculative arguments about the past, based on phenomena that exist in the present. If I hope to accomplish anything, it will be to simply encourage critical thinking. One must get past the arguments ad populum that its popularity counts for something , ad hominem that if you attack the person making the argument, this counts for something , and especially ad baculum that there are people who have the clout to decree it as true , to ask the key questions and challenge the unsubstantiated assumptions and thinking of those who would hold to the evolution position.
Today there are an increasing number of anti-creationist authors who are producing books and periodicals that make this relatively brief presentation insufficient to deal with all the points in dispute. Those defending creation today who don’t have the time to devote their life’s study to gaining expertise in all fields of inquiry must principally be prepared to think critically, logically, and challenge unsubstantiated assumptions made by these people. They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures 1 Peter 3: By way of definitions, I want to point out that when I speak of “evolution,” I am referring to the popular contemporary use of the word, which in a nutshell is the belief that all life forms are related by ancestry, and that the first life form occurred spontaneously, all due to completely natural processes.
When I speak of “creation,” I am referring to the inherently obvious fact that the origin of all life forms can be attributed to a creator who purposefully created them with planning and intent, and the documented fact that this occurred over the course of a week’s time several thousand years ago.
Genesis creation narrative Gap creationism Some gap creationists may believe that science has proven beyond reasonable doubt that the Earth is far older than can be accounted for by, for instance, adding up the ages of Biblical patriarchs and comparing it with secular historical data, as James Ussher famously attempted in the 17th century when he developed the Ussher chronology. For some, the gap theory allows both the Genesis creation account and geological science to be inerrant in matters of scientific fact.
Gap creationists believe that certain facts about the past and the age of the Earth have been omitted from the Genesis account; they hold that there was a gap of time in the Biblical account that lasted an unknown number of years between a first creation in Genesis 1:
A kiss is the touch or pressing of one’s lips against another person or an object. Cultural connotations of kissing vary widely. Depending on the culture and context, a kiss can express sentiments of love, passion, romance, sexual attraction, sexual activity, sexual arousal, affection, respect, greeting, friendship, peace, and good luck, among many others.
Clearly visible in the canyon walls are the light-colored granites, such as the Zoroaster Granite, which are stark against the darker, folded strata of the Vishnu Schist and the other metamorphic rock units of the Granite Gorge Metamorphic Suite1 see lowest purple and green shading in diagram. These are former sedimentary and volcanic strata that have been transformed by heat and pressure, possibly during the intense upheavals when the dry land was formed on Day 3 of Creation Week.
These were originally basalt lava flows several meters to tens of meters thick. In some outcrops pillow structures have been preserved, testimony to the basalt lavas having originally erupted and flowed under water onto the Creation Week ocean floor. Metamorphic rocks are not always easy to date using radio-isotopes. Results obtained usually signify the “date” of the metamorphism, but they may also yield the “age” of the original volcanic or sedimentary rock.
The “age” or “date” is calculated from the amount of the daughter isotope produced by radioactive decay of the parent isotope. In Grand Canyon, the “date” of metamorphism of the basalt lavas to form these Brahma amphibolites has been determined as Ma million years ago , based on U-Pb dating of minerals in the overlying Vishnu Schist and underlying Rama Schist that formed during the metamorphism. These included seven samples from a meter long and 2 meter wide amphibolite body outcropping just upstream from the mouth of Clear Creek at river mile 84 measured from Lees Ferry.
All 27 samples were sent to two well-credentialed internationally-recognized, commercial laboratories for radioisotope analyses—potassium-argon K-Ar at a Canadian laboratory, and rubidium-strontium Rb-Sr , samarium-neodymium Sm-Nd , and lead-lead Pb-Pb , at an Australian laboratory. Both laboratories use standard, best-practice procedures on state-of-the-art equipment.
Results The model K-Ar ages for each of the samples ranged from
This happened to me the other night. A dear friend and I were talking about our kids and how to help them transition from children to adults. The topic of dating and relationships came up and we started talking about my story. It somehow validates my belief that some of the teachings I grew up with were very wrong. Fear of loving and losing.
As a federally recognized (c)(3) nonprofit ministry of the USA, all gifts to ICR are completely tax deductible to the fullest extent allowed by U.S. law.
Why almost all scientists believe in evolution: It is impossible to prove that the theory of evolution is absolutely true. The theory maintains that plant evolution, animal evolution and the major geological changes to the earth unfolded over billions of years. Thus, the full theory cannot be demonstrated in the laboratory. Processes like the rise of mountains and erosion are simply too slow to be observed during one person’s lifetime. Elements of the theory e.
But nobody was on hand to observe what the world and its life forms looked like hundreds of millions of years ago. However, sufficient evidence exists in support of evolution to convince Evolution is the key unifying theory that unifies many different branches of science, from cosmology to biology. Why almost all conservative Protestants believe in creation science: Their acceptance in creation science is based mainly on two fundamental beliefs: One of the most fundamental assumptions held by conservative Protestants is that the Bible was inspired by God and thus is without error , as originally written.
Since the book of Genesis clearly describes that God created the universe, then it must be true.
Idealized and simplified diagram of the Grand Canyon There are a number of lava flows on the plateau that the canyon is cut into yellow in Figure 1, above. These lava flows are Cenozoic in age, and some of them spill into the canyon. The walls of the canyon are mostly cut into horizontal rock layers of Paleozoic age green in Figure 1, above. There is an angular unconformity at the bottom of the Paleozoic layers.
LDS Answers is dedicated to providing real answers to the tough questions regarding LDS history and doctrine. Many struggle to resolve concerns dealing with Joseph Smith’s polygamy, evolution, education, parenting, latter-day prophecy, historical issues and many other “Mormon stumpers”.
God places the cherubim, with a flaming sword, to guard the Tree of Life and Eden Gen. There is nothing in the Catechism that makes any teaching concerning original sin dependent on the sudden appearance of two immediately intelligent beings. Might we say that at some point in evolutionary history the mind of a being had the capacity to understand good and evil? Christianity and modern science are not at odds. To speculate otherwise, does no favor to either. Dick Prudlo Here is the hoax presented as likely.
Truth is at odds with what passes for science today, Jerd. And you fixation with this nonsense is clear. Augustine, allowed for metaphor in the Genesis story. It is undeniably packed with wisdom. One can continue to be informed by the story in the modern era, such as the warning about thoughtlessly succumbing to advertising. I may be wrong but I do know that all the pre and post Nicene fathers took it all quite literally.